Legal Opinion

American Finance Co. v. Trachtman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1931No. Appeal 288PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keleeb, J.,

This appeal arises out of a sheriff’s interpleader issue.

The claimant neglected to file his statement and bond within two weeks after the sheriff’s rule for an issue had been made absolute, and the plaintiff in the execution thereupon furnished the sheriff with a certified copy of the docket entries indicating that no bond and statement had been filed, pursuant to the Act of April 7, 1927, P. L. 174, amending the Sheriff’s Inter-pleader Act of May 26, 1897, P. L. 95.

Before the sheriff sold the goods, the court below on petition of the claimant permitted him to file his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bordentown Banking Co. v. ResteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Book v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. City of New Castle v. Whaley's HeirsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Barndollar v. FogartySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. A. S. & T. Co. v. Schock & SchockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chisley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  2. Breyer Ice Cream Co. v. RudleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. State College Borough v. Leathers, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1933
  4. Zeldin v. George Hess Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. A. M. Uhrik, Inc. v. Pennington, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API