A. S. & T. Co. v. Schock & Schock
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Judgment was éntered by default for want' of an affidavit of defense. After the term, a petition was presented to the court asking that judgment be opened as to him, alleging that he'was not a member of the firm sued and offering as an. excuse for his failure to enter, an affidavit of defense that he had told his co-defendant about the matter and that he had informed him that the.error of his inclusion in the suit had been corrected.
There was no answer to the petition and the court opened the judgment. It is. very evident that if the unanswered allegations of the petition are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- New Amsterdam Building & Loan Ass'n v. MoyermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Finance Co. v. TrachtmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Hertzog v. Forry, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1934
- Ott v. Ott, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1938