Legal Opinion

A. M. Uhrik, Inc. v. Pennington

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided December 31, 1957No. 81Published

1Opinion of the Court

Forrest, J.,

— A judgment debtor’s wife has filed a petition for a rule to show cause why a sheriff’s sale of personalty should not be set aside, so that she may file a property claim. Petitioner Anna Pennington has alleged that the sheriff of Montgomery County levied upon her personal property on an execution against her husband, that the sheriff notified her that the property was to be sold on September 3, 1957, that “she thereupon contacted *75the office of” her attorney, “in order that a property claim might be filed on her behalf”; that she was told that her attorney was away on a vacation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Finance Co. v. TrachtmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Walters v. PrattSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
  3. Charles v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API