Legal Opinion

Chisley v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 20, 1953No. [No. 106, October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The appellant, John William Chisley, was indicted for murder of Richard Henry Contee. His pleas were: 1, that he was not guilty, and 2, that he was insane at the time of the commission of the offense. It is admitted that he was sane at the time of the trial. He was tried before a jury on September 5, 1952, about a month after his indictment. After the Court had refused a motion for a directed verdict at the close of the State’s case, and at the conclusion of the whole case, the jury found the appellant sane at the time of the commission of the crime, sane then and guilty of murder in the…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Hopt v. PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Commonwealth v. Samuel JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Neusbaum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. State v. SchantzArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API