Legal Opinion
People v. Hoshor
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 1949No. Crim. 4316PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Having been convicted by the court without a jury of eight violations of the Corporate Securities Act (Stats. 1917, p. 673; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 3814) appellant demands a reversal of the judgments on two grounds, to wit, (1) the evidence is insufficient and (2) the act as construed by the trial court violates due process of law and equal protection of the law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution.
The Charge
It was charged that about September, 1947, appellant sold certificates of “beneficial interest in title to property, profits and earnings, more…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. EisemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Daugherty v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. SydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. SkeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. SearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. RankinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Mindenberg v. Carmel Film Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.