Legal Opinion

Bank of Picher v. Morris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1932No. 20042PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff in error, who hereinafter will be referred to as the protestant, from a judgment of the district court of Ottawa county in favor of the defendant in error, who hereinafter will be referred to as the protestee. The issues involve taxes for Ottawa county for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1926.

The protestee contends that the action cannot be maintained for the reason that the taxes were not paid prior to their maturity. In sup'port thereof he contends that chapter 151, Session Laws 1923, is unconstitutional and void for the reason that it is in conflict…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. In Re Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Ryan v. Roach Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Williamson v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Excise Board v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Battles v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Commission for Crippled ChildrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. CasadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Pfister v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API