Legal Opinion

Pfister v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1935No. 20760PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORN, Y. O. J.

On! February 21, 1922, the district court of Tulsa county rendered a judgment in an action pending in said court wherein one Ida Johnson was plaintiff and Tulsa Drew, a minor, was defendant, quieting title to certain real property situated in Tulsa county. On September 27, 1929, Tulsa Pfister, nee Drew, defendant in sa'id action, appealed from said judgment by petition in error and transcript of the record. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The petition in error recites that prior to her marriage defendant’s name (was Tulsa Drew; that she…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Frost v. WenieSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Rosencrans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Hamilton by and Through Hamilton v. VadenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. McLean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. In Re Crouch's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. The Institute For Responsible Alcohol Policy v. State ex rel. Alcohol Beverage Laws Enforcement Comm.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API