Legal Opinion
In re Santosky
New York City Family Court
Decided January 28, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHugh R. Elwyn, J.
Each of the respondents’ three children have been adjudicated to be neglected children within the meaning of article 10 of the Family Court Act and placed with the Commissioner of Social Services for an initial period of 18 months, subject to the further order of the court. Tina Frances Apel, age five, has been in foster home placement since November 20, 1973; John Santosky, age three, since September 30, 1974 and Jed Conrad Santosky, age two, since September 30, 1974. The court takes judicial notice of its own records that relate to the proceeding before it (Matter of Denlow, 87 Misc 2d 410,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of O.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re Orlando F.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re Stephen B.New York City Family Court · 1969
- In re KlugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In re Barbara P., Dominic P., & Abby P.New York City Family Court · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scott v. Prince George's County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re ApelNew York Family Court · 1978
- In re Suzanne N. Y.New York City Family Court · 1979