Legal Opinion

Santosky v. Kramer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 1982No. 80-5889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

455 U.S. 745 (1982)

SANTOSKY ET AL.

v.

KRAMER, COMMISSIONER, ULSTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL.

No. 80-5889.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 10, 1981

Decided March 24, 1982

CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.

Martin Guggenheim argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Alan N. Sussman.

Steven Domenic Scavuzzo argued the cause pro hac vice for respondents. With him on the brief was H. Randall Bixler. Wilfrid E. Marrin and Frederick J. Magovern filed a brief for respondents Balogh et al.[*]

Briefs of…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Blackmun; Dissent.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mondaca-Vega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Ms. L. v. U.S Immigration & Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  3. In re K.K.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Castillo v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  5. In re Adoption of Y.E.F. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API