Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Plaintiffs entered into a contract with the Phoenix Building and- Construction Company (which shall hereinafter be designated as the building company), for the construction of a building for the sum of $14,000. The Title Guaranty and Surety Company gave a bond to plaintiffs, in the sum of $3,500, as sureties for the performance of the contract by the building company. The building company did not complete said building or perform its contract, but abandoned the same. The plaintiffs brought this action against the building company and the surety company to recover damages in the sum of $3,500…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Lyon v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Solomon v. . Continental Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Niagara Fire Insurance v. ScammonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Remington v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Six Companies of Cal. v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13 of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Gerwin v. Southeastern California Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Payne v. De VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.