Legal Opinion

Porter v. Bucher

California Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1893No. 18032PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHaynes, J.

This action is in trover for the conversion of hay. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment against her, and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

Appellant is the wife of Howard B. Porter, with whom she lived upon a farm upon which her husband had duly filed a declaration of homestead, and which farm was principally used for raising hay. The wife was the owner of about one hundred and thirty head of cattle and twenty or thirty horses, which were her separate property, and were kept on the homestead.

The crop of hay for 1888, estimated at about one hundred and twenty tons, was stacked…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Stevens v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Claudius v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Levy v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Dubois v. SpinksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Guthrie v. CarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Sequeira v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Cady v. ZimmermanMontana Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API