Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Fisher

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1895No. 19361PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In April, 1891, the San Diego Opera House Company, a corporation, commenced the construction of an opera-house upon certain lands in the city of San Diego, employing the laborers and procuring the materials therefor without the intervention of an original contractor for the entire work. The land upon which the building was constructed was at that-time owned by the defendant Fisher, who was the president of the opera-house company, and directed the construction of the building as its president and in its. behalf. Fisher continued to be the owner of the land until November 20, 1891, when he…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Trustees of the German Lutheran Evangelical St. Matthew's Congregation v. HeiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  3. Mulcahy v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In re the Estate of DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Rapp v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. C.A. MacOmber v. L. M. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Scott, Blake & Wynne v. Summit Ridge Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API