Legal Opinion
SCM Corporation v. Brother International Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 12, 1970No. 69 Civ. 4150PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendants Brother International Corp. (hereinafter referred to as “Brother Japan”) and Brother Industries Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Ltd.”), both alien Japanese corporations neither licensed, registered nor residing in this country, move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (2) (3) and (5) for an order dismissing the within complaint as to them on the grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue and insufficiency of service of process.
Since resolution of the venue issue presented herein does not depend upon the complex factual setting underlying the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Honeywell, Inc. v. Metz ApparatewerkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. K. Hattori & Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Cryomedics, Inc. v. Spembly, LimitedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
- Soltex Polymer Corp. v. Fortex Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.