Legal Opinion
Cryomedics, Inc. v. Spembly, Limited
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 11, 1975No. Civ. B-74-453PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
NEWMAN, District Judge.
This motion to dismiss presents in an unusual procedural posture an important question of the reach of this Court’s in personam jurisdiction. Plaintiff Cryomedics, Inc. (“Cyromedies”) is a Connecticut corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of cryosurgical instruments that are sold to hospitals and surgeons. Defendants Spembly, Limited and Spembly Technical Products, Limited (referred to jointly as “Spembly”) are incorporated under the laws of Great Britain and have their principal place of business in England. Spembly is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Miller Brewing Company v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- American Footwear Corporation v. General Footwear Company Limited, and Universal City Studios, Inc., Intervening-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.