Legal Opinion
Honeywell, Inc. v. Metz Apparatewerke
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 7, 1975No. 72--1987PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Honeywell, Inc. (Honeywell) brought this action under the Patent Act of 1952, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the four named defendants had infringed two United States patents owned by plaintiff. Upon motion of one of the defendants, Metz Apparatewerke (Metz), appellee here, the District Court determined that it lacked personal juris*1139diction over such appellee and dismissed the complaint as to it. Honeywell, Inc. v. Metz Apparatewerke, 353 F.Supp. 492…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Amba Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Jobar International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.