Legal Opinion
Soltex Polymer Corp. v. Fortex Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1984No. 81 CV 0673PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MeLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This is an action for trademark infringement and unfair competition. Plaintiff, Soltex Polymer Corporation (“Soltex”), alleges that defendants have infringed its trademarks FORTIFLEX and FORTI-LENE by use of the identical mark FORTIFLEX and the similar mark FORTILON.
According to the complaint, Soltex sells raw plastic materials under two general technical classifications: high density polyethylene and polypropylene. The former is sold under the FORTIFLEX trademark, and the latter under the FORTILENE mark. The complaint alleges that defendants…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Pt United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Chrysler Capital Corp. v. Century Power Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc. v. Charles Schmitt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.