Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Lancaster

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1939No. Civ. 2264PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

On August 6, 1935, the trial court made an order appointing C. M. Grove guardian ad litem, of Henry 0. Boyd, an alleged incompetent person, for the purpose of com mencing proceedings in his behalf to cancel a deed executed by the incompetent. On the same day the action was instituted, defendant and respondent appeared by answer and cross-complaint. After trial, the court on June 29, 1937, signed findings of fact and conclusions of law conditionally ordering respondent to reconvey the property upon the payment to respondent Lancaster of certain amounts therein specified and decreed that if the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Judson v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lynch v. BenciniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Collison v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Sacks v. FSR Brokerage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Smith v. Bear Valley Milling & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API