Legal Opinion
Sacks v. FSR Brokerage, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1992No. B058585PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J.
After purchasing a house located at 3009 Vista Crest Drive in Los Angeles for $295,000, appellant Stephen E. Sacks sued the sellers (Jay and Joan Morgenstern) and respondents FSR Brokerage, Inc. (doing business as Fred Sands Realtors), Glen Gaither and Richard Beck. Respondents Gaither and Beck were the salespersons for respondent FSR Brokerage, Inc. Sacks’s complaint alleged that the 75-year-old house he purchased came with a defective foundation, inadequate or defective plumbing and heating, and no insulation. The complaint asserted causes of action for fraud,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Howe v. Pioneer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Spray, Gould & Bowers v. Associated International InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Sanchez v. Swinerton & Walberg Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.