Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. McCaskill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1964No. 253PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

Appellant assigns as error the admission of the testimony of plaintiff that he suffered an attack of amnesia on 20 May 1963, the overruling of appellant’s objection to a hypothetical question and Dr. Thomas H. Wright’s response thereto relating to plaintiff’s amnesia, the denial of the motion to strike all evidence of amnesia, and the refusal to instruct the jury not to consider such evidence in arriving at a verdict.

Plaintiff testified in substance: Immediately following the collision he was momentarily unconscious; he had pain in his back and left hip, loss of feeling in his left leg, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Riddle v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Godfrey v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Holley v. Acts, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Gillikin v. BurbageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API