Legal Opinion

Holley v. Acts, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 2003No. 482A02PublishedCited by 356 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Chief Justice.

This case arises from proceedings before the North Carolina Industrial Commission and raises the issue of whether the Commission’s findings of fact were supported by competent evidence establishing causation between an employment-related injury and the development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a condition caused by a blood clot in a deep vein which obstructs blood flow and causes inflammation.

At the time of the incident, plaintiff was forty-nine years old. She was on blood pressure medication to control her hypertension and was under a doctor’s care to lose weight. Since…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Harvey v. Raleigh Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by356 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Transit ManagementSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Adams v. METALS USACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Doe v. Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
  4. Hodgin v. HodginCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Springs v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

351 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API