In Re Estate of Wickersham
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring the appellants estopped from asserting any interest in the estate of the deceased, adjudging that they are not interested in said estate, and dismissing their petitions to revoke the probate of the will of said deceased.
Lydia C. Wickersham died on February 10, 1900, leaving as next of kin four children,—namely, Frank P. Wickersham, Frederick A. Wickersham, Lizzie C. Wickersham, and May L. Berg'evin. On March'27, 1900, the will of said deceased was duly admitted to probate by the superior court. Frank P. Wickersham died on March 14, 1900, leaving…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re Estate of EdelmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Wickersham v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.