Legal Opinion
Nielson v. Womer
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 1979No. Appeal, 1723 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DiSalle,
Ronald Nielson and Donald Cairns, trading as Aardvark Associates (Aardvark), appeal from an order of tbe Court of Common Pleas of Venango County granting defendants’ 1 motion for compulsory non-suit in a mandamus action instituted by Aardvark. We affirm.
At some time prior to April 29, 1977, defendants advertised for bids for the collection and disposal of garbage and refuse. Their bidding document contained the following questions:
What method of disposal do you plan on using?
What is the location?
Are the facilities contracted for?
The bidder shall provide either evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Harris v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. WinterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Whitemarsh Township Authority v. Finelli Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kimmel v. Lower Paxton TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Philadelphia v. CANTEEN, DIV. OF TW SER.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Regional Scaffolding & Hoisting Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Smith v. Borough of East StroudsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hanover Area Sch. Dist. v. Sarkisian Bros., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.