Legal Opinion

Pikur Enterprises, Inc. v. Commonwealth Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 1994PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (DOT) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) denying DOT’s motion for post-trial relief, seeking a new trial or judgment non obstante veredicto (JNOV). For the reasons which follow, we affirm.

The relevant facts of this case are not in dispute. Pikur Enterprises, Inc. (Pikur) was in the business of servicing corporate fleets. Thus, discarded automobile parts were added to Pikur’s inventory as it repaired the corporate vehicles. Because of this practice, most of Pikur’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milan v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Henry v. McCruddenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Olson & French, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Carlynton School District v. HaysCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chicchi v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. City of Chester v. Chester Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Ellis v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. White v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Cureton Ex Rel. Cannon v. Philadelphia School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API