Legal Opinion

City of Lincoln v. First National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1945No. 31918PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The city of Lincoln sought a declaratory judgment in the district court for Lancaster county to determine whether it was legal to continue the deposit of its funds in the defendant First National Bank of Lincoln, Nebraska, while a member of the city council was a stockholder, director or officer of the bank. The question arose by reason of identical provisions contained in section 3, art. VII, home rule charter, City of Lincoln, 1917, and section 15-603, R. S. 1943, applicable to cities of that class. The charter and the statute each provide in part: “No officer of the city shall be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hopkins v. GroveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Smrha v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hobbs, Wall & Co. v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Neisius v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ferle v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Frazier v. State by and Through PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Placek v. EdstromNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Arthur Ex Rel. City of Beatrice v. TrindelNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API