Legal Opinion
Arthur Ex Rel. City of Beatrice v. Trindel
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1959No. 34543PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiff, Russell E. Arthur, brought this action as a resident and taxpayer for and on behalf of the city of Beatrice and its taxpayers against defendant, Martin O. Trindel, doing business as M. O. Trindel Tire & Battery Company. Plaintiff sought recovery of all money allegedly paid to defendant for all material and services furnished the city by defendant from April 8, 1952, to December 12, 1955, while he was a salaried member of the city’s board of public works.
Plaintiff’s petition, filed March 15, 1957, set forth the provisions of section 16-325, R. R. S. 1943, and Beatrice City Ordinance…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Globe Publishing Co. v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- McNish v. General Credit CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Lincoln v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Neisius v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Myers v. Nebraska Investment CouncilNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Himrich v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Abel v. ConoverNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Moore v. Eggers Consulting Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Van Hosen v. Bankers Trust CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.