Legal Opinion

Hoiengs v. County of Adams

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1994No. S-92-777PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

On his own behalf and on behalf of other current and past participants in the defendant-appellee Retirement System for Nebraska Counties (the system), the original plaintiff-appellant, William Fairbanks, then an employee of the defendant-appellee York County, sought a declaration that the employees of the 91 defendant-appellee counties are entitled, under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 23-2301 et seq. (Reissue 1991) (the retirement act), to greater retirement contributions from their respective employer counties than is presently…

2Cases cited117 opinions

  1. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gibb v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Calabro v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. State of Nebraska E. Benjamin Nelson, Governor of the State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API