Legal Opinion
Aldom v. Borough of Roseland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 27, 1956PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
42 N.J. Super. 495 (1956)
127 A.2d 190
ROBERT S. ALDOM, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOROUGH OF ROSELAND, A MUNICIPAL CORP., JOHN BAKER, MAYOR, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 29, 1956.
Decided November 27, 1956.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Roy J. Grimley argued the cause for the appellants.
Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III, argued the cause for the respondents Borough of Roseland, et als. (Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys).
Mr. Everett B. Smith argued the cause for the respondents Henry Becker & Son, Inc., Farms Inc.,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Independent Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Pyatt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of DunellenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Zell v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Fleming v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Wyzykowski v. RizasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Wilson v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Wollen v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Zagoreos v. ConklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.