Placek v. Edstrom
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Bank of Prague and Emil Placek, its president, instituted this action to obtain a declaratory judgment construing Chapter 11, Session Laws of Nebraska, 1945, appearing as sections 8-163.01 and 8-163.02, R. S. Supp., 1945, and hereinafter generally designated as the act, to be permissive of an alleged new check-clearance exchange formula adopted by the bank after August 10, 1945, the effective date of the act, or in the alternative to declare the act unconstitutional and enjoin its enforcement. The act is generally known as the Par Check Law. The Leshara State Bank intervened, asking similar…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lehigh Water Co. v. EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Schallenberger v. First State Bank of HolsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ledwith v. Bankers Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. SwindleNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Krepcik v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Roy v. BLADEN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. R-31Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Knepper v. Monticello State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.