Legal Opinion
State v. Norris
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided August 12, 2004No. 20020966-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
¶ 1 After entering an unconditional, voluntary guilty plea to three counts of communications fraud, Richard Norris (Defendant) challenges the constitutionality of the underlying statute (the communications fraud statute) on appeal. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1801 (2003).1 We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Defendant was charged with seven counts of communications fraud and was bound over on all counts. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-1801 (2003). After several days of trial, Defendant entered an unconditional, voluntary guilty plea to three counts of third-degree-felony communications…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pacific Frontier v. Pleasant Grove CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- West Jordan City v. GoodmanUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MattinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. NorrisUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. OwenColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.