Legal Opinion

West Jordan City v. Goodman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2006No. 20040944PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 After the West Jordan Justice Court convicted Christopher Goodman of two misdemeanor charges, Goodman exercised his statutory right to a trial de novo in the district court. 1 There, Goodman raised a constitutional challenge to the statutory scheme authorizing municipal justice courts, 2 arguing that it violates the separation of powers principles of the Utah Constitution. 3 Goodman also argued that municipal court judges are biased and have an impermissible conflict of interest because they are employed and controlled by the municipalities that benefit from…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. LopesUtah Supreme Court · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wilson v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration NetworkUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Hess v. Canberra Development Co., LCUtah Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API