Legal Opinion
Hill v. Colorado
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 28, 2000No. 98-1856PublishedCited by 1,318 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
At issue is the constitutionality of a 1993 Colorado statute that regulates speech-related conduct within 100 feet of the entrance to any health eare facility. The specific section of the statute that is challenged, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-122(3) (1999), makes it unlawful within the regulated areas for any person to “knowingly approach” within eight feet of another person, without that person’s consent, “for the purpose of passing a leaflet or handbill to, displaying a sign to, or engaging in oral protest, education, or counseling with such other person....”1 Although the statute prohibits…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,318 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Pahls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
1,313 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.