State v. Mattinson

WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:

1 Richard Jeremy Mattinson was convict, ed of second degree felony communications fraud. Mattinson properly appealed his conviction to the Utah Court of Appeals, arguing that the Communication Fraud statute, Utah Code section 76-10-1801, is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague. The court of appeals affirmed his conviction, relying on its previous ruling in State v. Norris. 1

2 Mattinson then petitioned for a writ of certiorari, which we granted. In our original order, we requested that the parties address only whether section 76-10-1801, the Communications…