Legal Opinion
Pacific Frontier v. Pleasant Grove City
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2005No. 04-4010, 04-4018PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Burdened by the City of Pleasant Grove’s ordinance establishing a solicitors licensing procedure, plaintiffs — individuals and entities engaged in selling Kirby vacuum cleaners through door-to-door solicitations — sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that the licensing ordinance violated their First Amendment commercial speech rights. The case proceeded to a preliminary injunction hearing, following which the district court found that, in addition to satisfying the other factors of the preliminary injunction test, plaintiffs have a substantial likelihood of showing that…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Beltronics USA, Inc. v. Midwest Inventory Distribution, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Morris v. NoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.