Legal Opinion

Grady v. Barth

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 19, 2013No. 1 CA-SA 13-0106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge.

¶ 1 The issue in this special action is whether the superior court has discretion to deny a stay to a defendant in possession of property who is appealing a judgment in a forcible entry and detainer action when the plaintiff never had a landlord-tenant relationship with the defendant and, instead, purchased the property at a non-judicial trustee’s sale. As we explain, the answer is “no.”

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The relevant facts are undisputed. In 2008, petitioners Michael and Jennifer Grady executed a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on improved…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of Ny v. DodevCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand HaddockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. Tri City National Bank v. BarthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Erik De Jong v. Jle-04 Parker, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API