Legal Opinion

Tri City National Bank v. Barth

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 17, 2015No. 1 CA-SA 14-0249PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge:

¶ 1 Tri City National Bank (“TCNB”) petitions for special action relief from the superi- or court’s order granting Real Parties in Interest’s (“the Gradys’ ”) motion for stay of execution of a Forcible Entry and Detainer (“FED”) judgment, pending appeal of the superior court’s order denying the Gradys’ Motion to Set Aside Judgment. We accept jurisdiction and grant relief. We hold that because the Gradys are appealing a judgment denying their Motion to Set Aside, the trial court abused its discretion when it granted a stay of execution of a judgment other than the judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Levinson v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Grady v. BarthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Tonnemacher v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Tovar v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. STATE EX REL. MONTGOMERY v. WhittenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Apache Produce Imports, LLC v. Malena Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API