Legal Opinion

Masciulli v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1986No. 8510SC1308PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the law pertaining to evidence offered by plaintiff on defendant’s failure to keep a proper lookout and to keep the automobile under proper control. Plaintiff, in her brief, correctly cites Beanblossom v. Thomas, 266 N.C. 181, 146 S.E. 2d 36 (1966), for the following principle:

Unless the driver of the leading vehicle is himself guilty of negligence, or unless an emergency is created by some third person or other highway hazard; the mere fact of a collision with the vehicle ahead furnishes some evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keith v. PolierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Holbrook v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Allen v. EfirdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Colvin v. BadgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API