Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Henley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1995No. 9418SC417PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, MARK D., Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred by submitting the doctrine of sudden emergency to the jury.

This action arose out of a motor vehicle collision which occurred on 28 March 1989. The site of the collision was U.S. Highway 29 South, near the East Lee Street exit, within the city limits of Greensboro, North Carolina.

The evidence at trial revealed the following: At the time of the accident, plaintiff, Richard Holbrook, and defendant, Tommy Gayle Henley, were operating their vehicles on Highway 29 South. Plaintiff was proceeding in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Beanblossom v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Brunson v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Keith v. PolierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Schaefer v. WicksteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Long v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Anthony Mathis v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  3. Carrington v. EmoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Overton v. PurvisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Allen v. EfirdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API