State v. Kampert
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury for the crime of carnal knowledge of a female child under the age of 18, tried in the district court for Martin county before Tifft, J., and a jury which returned a verdict of guilty. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant 'appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge of 'a girl under the age of 18 years, and appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The errors assigned are: (1) That incorrect instructions were given to the jury and correct instructions were refused; (2) th'at improper testimony was admitted to contradict and impeach the girl who was a witness for defendant; (3) that the prosecuting attorney was guilty of misconduct; and (4) that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the conviction.
1. The indictment charges the offense as committed on November 4, 1915. The step-mother…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larkin v. Saltair Beach Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. ForshaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State v. MulhallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. GoodsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- State v. LeecySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Gates v. MaderIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.