King v. Concordia Fire-Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Benzie; Chittenden, J. Assumpsit by Wallace E. King against the Concordia Fire-Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. There •was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Defendant insured plaintiff’s stock of general merchandise against loss by fire. A fire occurred, and the merchandise was destroyed. This suit was brought to recover on the policy. Plaintiff had judgment in the-court below. Defendant appeals to this court.
The most important of plaintiff’s books of account and the inventory of his goods (which were kept in a wooden *260desk in the store containing his merchandise) were also destroyed by the fire above mentioned. Defendant insists that it was entitled to a judgment because these books and inventory were not kept in “an iron safe at night, or in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Dowling v. Lancashire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Goddard v. East Texas Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Georgia Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. DeyU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Brewster Street Housing SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- New York Life Insurance v. HardisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Westervelt v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.