Legal Opinion

Cordero v. Cordero

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 2002No. G024341PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.—

I. Introduction

This case illustrates the harsh effect of the literal operation of our spousal support collection statutes combined with a high rate of legal interest. Our *655colleagues in Division Two of this appellate district attempted to amelonate that harshness in In re Marriage of Plescia (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 252 [69 Cal.Rptr.2d 120], which allowed a common law laches defense to spousal support collection. As we explain below, Plescia was “incorrectly” decided insofar as it applied to collection efforts within the old 10-year period that a payee spouse had to renew a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Graham v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Wolfe v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Philip v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Moyse v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Burch v. CertainTeed Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Marriage of Hudson CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API