Cordero v. Cordero
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.—
I. Introduction
This case illustrates the harsh effect of the literal operation of our spousal support collection statutes combined with a high rate of legal interest. Our *655colleagues in Division Two of this appellate district attempted to amelonate that harshness in In re Marriage of Plescia (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 252 [69 Cal.Rptr.2d 120], which allowed a common law laches defense to spousal support collection. As we explain below, Plescia was “incorrectly” decided insofar as it applied to collection efforts within the old 10-year period that a payee spouse had to renew a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Graham v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Wolfe v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Philip v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Moyse v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Burch v. CertainTeed Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Marriage of Hudson CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.