Elk v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
Plaintiff, a member of Oglala Sioux Tribe, filed suit in this court seeking relief under the Article I clause of the Sioux Treaty of April 29, 1868, which provides that if “bad men” among the whites commit “any wrong” upon the person or property of any Sioux, the United States will reimburse the injured person for the loss sustained. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s case under RCFC 12(b)(1), asserting that plaintiff has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies.
I. BACKGROUND
In 2002, Lavetta Elk, who was living on the Pine Ridge Indian…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Stovall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Garreaux v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Elk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.