Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Rowe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1986No. 515A84PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment action for the construction of a will. The question is whether a devise of a specified number of acres, not described by metes and bounds, out of a larger tract is too vague to be valid. The Court of Appeals, relying on Hodges v. Stewart, 218 N.C. 290, 10 S.E. 2d 723 (1940), concluded that it was and vacated the trial court’s summary judgment for defendant which sustained the devise. We overrule Hodges v. Stewart, reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision and reinstate the judgment of the trial court. We conclude under the circumstances of this case…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowden v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. In Re Estate of PeeblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Gibboney v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. North Carolina National Bank v. AppleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Colombo v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API