State v. Freeman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether this Court should continue to adhere to the common law rule rendering spouses incompetent to testify against each other in a criminal proceeding. We believe that the common law rule no longer com plies with the purposes for which it was created, therefore, we alter the rule in the manner set forth below to more closely achieve its purpose without unduly hindering the administration of criminal justice.
Defendant contends that because the common law rule preventing spouses from testifying against each other in a criminal…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Francis v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. HurleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. LeDucSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.