Legal Opinion

Mims v. Mims

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1982No. 109PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Plaintiff seeks by this action to be declared the sole beneficial owner of certain residential real estate. The deed to the realty was made to both parties as husband and wife, but it is undisputed that plaintiff furnished the entire purchase price from his separate estate. The principal question presented is whether the evidentiary showing before Judge Bailey entitles defendant to summary judgment. Judge Bailey believed it did and the Court of Appeals agreed. We disagree and reverse. We also carefully reconsider our old rules relating to presumptions of gift and resulting trust…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Great American Insurance v. C. G. Tate Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Burnside v. BurnsideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Whiting v. WhitingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Collins v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API