Legal Opinion

Bowden v. Bell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 1994No. 934SC1135PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiffs decedent, Hubert Washington, commenced this negligence action for injuries received when he was struck by a car driven by defendant Michael Bell (hereinafter “defendant”). Prior to trial, Hubert Washington died, and Kimberly Washington Bowden, as personal representative of Hubert Washington, was substituted as the plaintiff. For purposes of this opinion, however, Hubert Washington will be referred to as “plaintiff.” The trial court submitted to the jury issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and last clear chance. The jury found that defendant had the last…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Gunter v. . WickerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Environmental Landscape Design Specialist v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Outlaw v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Ted Mark Monk v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority Quality Electric Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Monk v. Virgin Islands Water & Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Nealy v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Trantham v. Estate of Sorrells Ex Rel. SorrellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API