Legal Opinion

North Carolina National Bank v. Apple

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1989No. 8818DC1333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

In construing wills there is a general presumption against intestacy. McKinney v. Mosteller, 85 N.C. App. 429, 365 S.E.2d 612 (1987), rev’d on other grounds, 321 N.C. 730, 365 S.E.2d 612 (1988). A residuary clause in a will should be construed so as to prevent intestacy as to any part of the testator’s estate, unless there is an apparent intent to the contrary. Id. Citing Faison v. Middleton, 171 N.C. 170, 88 S.E. 141 (1916). The court has a duty to render a will operative and to give effect to testator’s intent if reasonable interpretation can be given which is not in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faison v. . MiddletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Kale v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Bear v. BearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Stephenson v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. McKinney v. MostellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colombo v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Cameron v. BissetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Erlenbach v. Estate of ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API