Legal Opinion

Quintana v. Motel 6, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1984No. 7855PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

Defendants appeal from an order setting aside a portion of a court-approved settlement in a worker’s compensation action. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred. We hold it did and reverse.

Plaintiff suffered an accidental injury to her lower back in April, 1982. Following discovery the parties entered into a settlement which included extended medical benefits for a period of two years up to a limit of $9,000. The trial court approved the settlement in January, 1983. Less than a year later plaintiff through new counsel moved for relief from the judgment,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ratzlaff v. Seven Bar Flying Service, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. De Witt v. Miami Transit CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Mendenhall v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meiboom v. WatsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway & Transportation Department v. GarleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Western Commerce Bank v. GillespieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. City of Raton v. ARKANSAS RIVER POWER AUTHORITYDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2009
  5. Riesenecker v. Arkansas Best Freight SystemsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API