Legal Opinion
Meiboom v. Watson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 2000No. 25,207PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
{1} Petitioner-Defendant, Stephen Watson, challenges the Court of Appeals’ holding that the district court erred by denying plaintiffs’ motion for relief from a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Rule 1-060(B)(6) NMRA 1999. See Meiboom v. Watson, 1998-NMCA-091, ¶ 17, 125 N.M. 462, 963 P.2d 539. We have jurisdiction pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 34-5-14(B) (1972), and on certiorari we consider: 1) whether the Court of Appeals, by concluding that the district court retained jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ Rule 1-060(B)(6) motion, improperly overruled this Court’s opinion in King v.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Marvin Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Edward A. Ashford v. Charles Steuart, Don Erby, Ray Beaman, Steve Stedfelt, and Maynard RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In the Matter of Emergency Beacon Corporation, Debtor. Montco, Inc. v. Harvey S. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- L. P. Steuart, Inc. v. Joseph H. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Piano v. Premier Distributing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. BoyettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Ferrell v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Sunland Park v. MacIasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Brooks v. Norwest Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.