Legal Opinion
Bogle v. Potter
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1961No. 6596PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant seeks to have us review the action of the trial court in overruling her motion, praying the entry of judgment on the basis of an alleged compromise of two separate lawsuits.
The circumstances requiring an opinion on this matter, which is actually a cross-appeal, are extremely unusual and such that they could very possibly never recur.
The parties will be designated by their names, in order to make for clearer understanding of the situation.
Plaintiff, Mrs. Bogle, filed two suits in the lower court, one in her own individual capacity against Mr. Potter and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Arias v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Sundt v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Michael v. BaumanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Giovannini v. TurriettaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Knippel v. Northern Communications, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. Hanosh Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Guest v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.