Legal Opinion
Valderrama v. Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 14, 2007No. Civil L-05-747PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGG, Chief Judge.
Now pending is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Because the parties have adequately briefed the issues, a hearing is unnecessary. 1 See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2004). For the reasons stated herein, the Court will, in a separate order, grant the motion and dismiss the case.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 8, 2005, Mariela Valdera-ma (‘Valderrama”) filed the instant suit against her former employer, Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc. (“Honeywell”). 2 Her complaint states the following claims:
• Count I (state law): Invasion of privacy-
• Count II (state law): Invasion…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Kathleen A. Shanaghan v. John D. Cahill Cahill & Associates, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Elizabeth F. Smith v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Prelich v. Medical Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Littleton Ex Rel. Estate of Boggs v. SwongerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Sewell v. Strayer UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Adams v. WallensteinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Aletum v. Wesco Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.